(A Marxian perspective of the role of Government and the state within capitalism)
\n (Written during the last general election in the UK).<\/p>\n
Manifestos have been published, promises have been made and intentions made opaque by the vagueness that always accompanies the usual mixture of hope, cynicism and downright duplicity displayed by establishment politicians. We can now all sit back and await the inevitable failures, betrayals and hypocrisy of a new government.<\/p>\n
This is not a statement of cynical bitterness or even one resulting from the betrayed hopes of the past but merely a recognition of what the state (of which the government is merely the executive) was created for and how it has evolved. We are always told at election time that the people have the power to create political change by voting for one political party or another \u2013 this lies at the heart of the claim that ours is a \u2018democratic\u2019 country. Many believe the last 14 years of Tory rule has been a failure but the rich have become richer, the state has become ever more powerful and the Washington oligarchs couldn\u2019t be more pleased with the government\u2019s subservience to their imperial needs. From a ruling class perspective the Tories have delivered everything they desired.<\/p>\n
Of course, there have been the odd ideologues who actually believe the propaganda and seek some kind of radical right-wing changes (Braverman, Truss, Patel etc.) who have rocked the boat but they have been seen off and it was business as usual. These individuals, together with their left-wing counterparts like Corbyn, Galloway and Abbott, really seem to believe that government action can improve people\u2019s lives. Perhaps a reality check is timely for those idealists and for anyone who still believes that a government can be a vehicle for the profound change that our society so desperately needs.<\/p>\n
The origin of parliament<\/strong> As the nation-state became increasingly centralised during the Tudor period the financial system grew ever more complex requiring a specialism that was quite alien to most aristocrats. The \u2018House of Commons\u2019 became ever more important as it consisted of those who knew how to exploit the labour force for profit and so contributed the lion\u2019s share of taxable revenue. This evolution was accelerated by the political revolution of 1642 and subsequently, despite an attempted counter revolution by the King in 1688, the capitalist class through their representatives in parliament became the dominant political and economic power. However, the purpose of the government did not change as its primary purpose remained to serve the economic needs of another tiny parasitic class.<\/p>\n Governments and the states they control have never existed to serve the needs of the people as a whole but only to preserve the wealth and power of parasitic elites. The first rule of any parliament is: thou shall not over-burden the wealthy with taxes, and so the running of the nation\u2019s infrastructure is always accomplished with the least expenditure possible. The second rule is to ensure that no laws should be passed that in any way impede profitability, and so ensure that those who create wealth never have direct access to it, but only through a system of rationing called wages and salaries. Despite this, many political idealists continue to believe that social improvement is possible using the state and its government. But why this political illusion and the normalisation of this political lie?<\/p>\n Republicans ancient and modern<\/strong> There is no evidence that Catiline or Caesar ever intended to destroy Rome and we have only Cicero\u2019s words to that effect. Of course he never mentioned the class interests that he served and all his rhetoric about the \u2018Republic\u2019 merely obscured his real motive to preserve the power and economic interests of the patrician elite. All reformers were demonised as wreckers of society \u2013 sound familiar?<\/p>\n Any governments who call themselves republics are essentially the same as their ancient counterparts. They believe in an elite that are entitled to rule through tradition and, usually, inherited wealth. Although the UK calls itself a constitutional monarchy it is, in fact, no different from the capitalist republics described above \u2013 the monarch is one of the wealthiest capitalists of them all. So the tradition for all capitalist governments is to talk continuously about democracy whilst ensuring its impossibility. But the gloomy gothic corridors of power within Westminster are not the only, or even the most important, centre of political power.<\/p>\n Since the Second World War the ruling class of this country have aligned themselves with the interests of the Washington oligarchs and so become willing subjects of US imperialism. No UK \u2018foreign policy\u2019 is decided without consulting this military empire (aka NATO). Even after Brexit, the EU together with the WTO and the World Bank have a significant impact on what Westminster can do economically, and this leads us to another great power on the global stage, the multi-national corporations. Their lobbying of governments is unceasing and connections with politicians, corrupt or otherwise, is undeniable. Many of the same individuals are involved in these organisations which can deservedly be called \u2018the establishment\u2019. They all share a common interest in defending their trade-routes, market share, cheap labour, natural resources etc. from the other capitalist cabals of Russia and China. But all of them are subject to the ultimate power of the anarchic fluctuations of capitalist economics which none of them, it would seem, have much understanding of.<\/p>\n The excuse of the recent Tory government for its manifest failures were the COVID pandemic and the war in Ukraine \u2013 both of which might have been predicted but would anyway have been ignored by the overriding necessity for economic \u2018growth\u2019 and bigger profits. Given all this one is tempted to ask, what is the point of national governments? The oligarchs of ancient Rome, like Cicero and Cato, could tell you why \u2013 to preserve the illusion of national\/tribal communal interest and deny class division so as to exclude the majority from power.<\/p>\n Starmer is no different from his war-mongering predecessor Blair and will do anything to placate the power of the \u2018establishment\u2019. Like Cicero he will claim to be a protector of legitimacy and justice but will be infinitely flexible when he is required to excuse genocide in Gaza or persecute the sick and the unemployed. Remember, the parasites and their defenders like the Labour Party depend on the masses of workers to produce the means and wealth for their own continued exploitation. The real historical power belongs to us workers and we must turn away from these hypocrites, liars and fools and take responsibility for this world into our own hands.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Government by the Few for the Few (A Marxian perspective of the role of Government and the state within capitalism) (Written during the last general election in the UK). Manifestos have been published, promises have been made and intentions made opaque by the vagueness that always accompanies the usual mixture of hope, cynicism and downright … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":103,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","_bluesky_dont_syndicate":"","_bluesky_syndication_accounts":"","_bluesky_syndication_text":""},"categories":[246,229,149],"tags":[148,90,31,145,146,147],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":106,"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93\/revisions\/106"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/the.apoplectic-politico.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nThe relationship between the King and his barons had, since medieval times, been a tense struggle for money and power. On many occasions actual wars broke out, and there were subsequent attempts to reach a settlement between the King and his court and the barons and their private armies, of which the most famous were a series called Magna Carta. The King was obliged to call on the advice of the kingdom\u2019s magnates before raising taxes or going to war etc. This is the origin of governance through parliament.<\/p>\n
\nThe capitalist class\u2019s need to legitimise their form of government has a long history. Many \u2018gentlemen\u2019 historians of the past, and some even today, look back to the likes of Cicero as a hero of republican virtues, struggling against malign populists and demagogues like Catiline and Julius Caesar. He allegedly stood for constitutional values and anti-tyranny, but this overlooks his involvement with the murder squads that were sent out by the Senate to destroy anyone who spoke of reforming the system to benefit the people. His hands were drenched with the blood of those who challenged the oligarchs in control of a Senate (government) that ensured their continual accumulation of wealth and power.<\/p>\n